Should i take extra folic acid with my prenatal vitamin

Can Fam Physician. 2012 Apr; 58(4): 394–397.

Language: English | French

Identifir les femmes susceptibles de bénéfiier de doses plus élevées d’acide folique durant la grossesse

Abstract

Question One of my epileptic patients who takes carbamazepine is planning to become pregnant. She told me that Motherisk advised her to take 5 mg of folic acid daily until the end of the first trimester. Are there other women who need more than the regular dose of folic acid included in prenatal vitamins?

Answer Women who are at high risk of having babies with neural tube defects and who would benefit from higher doses of folic acid include those with certain folate-enzyme genotypes, previous pregnancies with neural tube defects, diabetes, malabsorption disorders, or obesity, or those who take antifolate medications or smoke. Such women should take 5 mg/d of folic acid for the 2 months before conception and during the first trimester.

Résumé

Question Une de mes patientes prend de la carbamazépine pour l’épilepsie et planifie une grossesse. Elle m’a dit que Motherisk lui avait conseillé de prendre 5 mg d’acide folique jusqu’à la fin du premier trimestre. Y a-t-il des femmes qui ont besoin d’une dose plus élevée d’acide folique que celle contenue habituellement dans les vitamines prénatales?

Réponse Parmi les femmes à risque élevé d’avoir un bébé ayant une anomalie du tube neural (ATN) et qui bénéficieraient de doses plus élevées d’acide folique, on peut mentionner celles qui ont certains génotypes associés aux enzymes de synthèse du folate, qui ont eu une grossesse antérieure ayant pour issue une ATN, qui sont atteintes de diabète, qui ont des problèmes de malabsorption, qui sont obèses, qui prennent des médicaments antifoliques ou qui fument. Ces femmes devraient prendre 5 mg/j d’acide folique 2 mois avant la conception et durant le premier trimestre de grossesse.

At the beginning of the 1990s, 2 randomized controlled studies showed that folic acid supplementation could prevent most neural tube defects (NTDs).1,2 In studying women with previous NTD-affected pregnancies, Wald et al found that 4 mg/d of folic acid was an effective dosage.1 In studying families with no previous cases of NTDs, Czeizel and colleagues showed the effectiveness of 0.8 mg/d of folic acid supplementation starting before conception.2 As a result of these studies, the US Food and Drug Administration, Health Canada, and similar authorities worldwide agreed to fortify flour with folic acid starting in 1997 to 1998. The results were dramatic, with an up to 50% decrease in rates of NTDs.3

Yet, as stated by Wald et al in 2001, supplementation of folic acid at 0.4 mg/d (as suggested by most authorities) or 0.8 to 0.9 mg/d (the amount contained in most prenatal vitamins) did not produce protective levels in many women.4 Indeed, in 2008 Motherisk found that, in Ontario, 40% of women did not achieve the protective red blood cell folate level of 900 nmol/L before conception.5

This is not surprising, as intersubject variability in many factors associated with folic acid metabolism and response has been clarified during the past decade, suggesting that higher daily doses of this vitamin might be needed to maximize its protective effect on the fetus.

The aim of this article is to highlight the clinical factors and conditions for which there is published evidence for increased risk of NTDs or other folic acid–sensitive congenital malformations. These pregnancies might benefit from higher doses of folic acid before conception and during the first trimester of pregnancy (Box 1).

Box 1.

Women who might benefit from higher doses of folic acid in pregnancy

Polymorphisms associated with NTDs

Folate is an essential B vitamin that acts as a cofactor in critical metabolic pathways, which involve both DNA synthesis and methylation. Several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the enzymes in these critical pathways have been investigated for involvement in the failure of neural tube closure in humans.

Naturally occurring folates are polyglutamated. These must be converted to their monoglutamate form before they can be absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract into circulation. The enzyme folylpoly-γ-glutamate carboxypeptidase II is responsible for the hydrolysis of the polyglutamyl chain of naturally occurring folates. This enzyme is located on the apical aspect of the intestinal brush border.6,7 Once in monoglutamate form, folate is absorbed by the reduced folate carrier (RFC) and enters the blood stream as 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, a monoglutamate. 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate is carried into the cytoplasm of cells through folate receptors (FRs) α, β, and γ and the RFC.7 Folate receptors β and γ and the RFC have lower affinity for 5-methyltetrahydrofolate than the FR α.7,8 Expression of FR α is limited predominantly to the kidneys, choroid plexus, and placenta, while the RFC is ubiquitously expressed.9,10

A polymorphism has been demonstrated in the glutamate carboxypeptidase II gene C1561T, which codes for the enzyme folylpoly-γ-glutamate carboxypeptidase II.11 The SNP results in reduced activity of the enzyme and reduced plasma folate levels.11 Synthetic folic acid is in the monoglutamate form and does not require this enzyme to be absorbed.11 Autoantibodies directed against the FR, blocking the binding of folic acid and inhibiting folate uptake, were identified in a small study of women whose pregnancies had been complicated by NTDs.11

Another SNP that encodes for the RFC has been identified, A80G, which results in an impaired ability to transport folates into the cytoplasm.12 This SNP has been associated with NTDs, particularly when there is a lack of maternal prenatal folic acid supplementation.12–15

Once inside the cell, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate acts as a methyl donor in several ways. The remethylation of homocysteine to methionine is enzymatically driven by methionine synthase, which results in conversion of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate and methionine. Tetrahydrofolate is acted upon by serine hydroxymethyltransferase and converted to 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate. 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate can then be used in various pathways. It can be converted by methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase to 10-formyltetrahydrofolate for purine synthesis; be irreversibly converted to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate by methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; or operate as a methyl donor in the conversion of deoxyuridylate by thymidylate synthase, resulting in thymidine monophosphate and dihydrofolate. Dihydrofolate is converted to tetrahydrofolate via the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase.

An SNP in the methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase gene, G1958A, was found to confer an increased risk of having an NTD-affected child.16 Methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase provides 10-formyltetrahydrofolate, which is essential for purine synthesis.17 Inadequate availability of folate for purines might result in DNA breaks and chromosome damage.17

A base-pair deletion in the dihydrofolate reductase gene has been shown to increase the risk of having a child with spina bifida.18

A polymorphism in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C667T, which results in a thermolabile form of the enzyme, has been extensively studied in association with NTDs. In a 2000 meta-analysis, Botto and Yang found that mothers with this polymorphism were at a 2-fold increased risk of having children with NTDs (odds ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.8), while infants with this polymorphism had an 80% increased risk of NTDs (odds ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.2).19 A second SNP in this gene, A1298C, has also been associated with NTDs.20 This polymorphism also results in reduced activity of the enzyme, but not to the same extent as the C667T polymorphism does.

A base-pair repeat sequence was identified in the gene that encodes for the enzyme thymidylate synthase, which, when expressed as a double repeat sequence, was associated with an increased risk of NTDs in infants.21

Because these SNPs are associated with a risk of not achieving protective systemic levels of folic acid, clinicians should offer women known to have such polymorphisms 5 mg/d of folic acid before conception and until the end of the first trimester (ie, until after closure of the neural tube).

Previous pregnancy with NTD

While the risk of NTDs in the general population in North America is currently less than 1 per 1000 pregnancies, the risk in women with previous pregnancies with NTDs is 40-fold higher, at around 4%.1 In the breakthrough randomized controlled trial by Wald et al, 4-mg/d of folic acid decreased this risk by 75% compared with women who did not receive folic acid supplementation.1 Therefore, it is critical to provide the available 5-mg/d folic acid supplement to women with previous NTD-affected pregnancies.

Exposure to drugs with antifolate activity

Women planning pregnancy might be exposed to medications with known antifolate activities affecting different parts of the folic acid metabolic cascade. A relatively large number of epidemiologic studies have shown an increased risk of NTDs among babies exposed in early gestation to antiepileptic drugs (carbamazepine, valproate, barbiturates), sulfonamides, or methotrexate.22

Hence, whenever women use these medications, or have used them near conception, they should take 5 mg/d of folic acid until the end of the first trimester of pregnancy.

Maternal conditions

As more women postpone starting their families into their 30s or 40s, up to 5% of women of reproductive age are estimated to suffer from malabsorption syndrome because of conditions such as Crohn disease. These women often absorb folate suboptimally. Obese women also have a higher risk of NTDs in their offspring, as do women with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus, even after correction for insufficient folate supplementation.23

Suboptimal adherence

In a recent study, we showed that even women volunteering to take folic acid had low overall adherence of 53% (ranging from 0% to 100%).24 If you suspect or have proof of low compliance, it is logical to prescribe 5 mg/d of folic acid, as it will ensure that the woman meets the folic acid requirement even if she takes the supplement sporadically.

Conclusion

Pregnant women with many of the conditions discussed above will not necessarily have levels of folic acid below the protective range. However, it appears that their relative resistance to folic acid necessitates higher doses, up to 5 mg/d for a short period, encompassing the prepregnancy months and the first 3 months of pregnancy.

Concerns that excess folic acid might increase later risk of colon cancer have been addressed by numerous studies and meta-analyses, which have failed to show such an association.25 More important, pregnant women would only be exposed to 5 mg/d of folic acid for several months and not for the many years that these studies focused on.

It is important to offer selected high-risk women folic acid doses above the amounts contained in typical prenatal vitamins. While most pregnant women would benefit from daily folic acid doses of 0.4 mg through diet, or folic acid doses of 0.8 to 0.9 mg/d as found in most prenatal vitamins, selected groups of women at high risk might benefit from daily folic acid doses of 5 mg starting from 2 months before conception up to the end of the first trimester. These women include those with previous children with NTDs, specific genotypes related to folic acid metabolism, diabetes mellitus, or malabsorption syndrome, or those women who are exposed to antifolate drugs, are obese, or smoke, as well as women with proven or suspected low adherence with folic acid supplementation.

Notes

MOTHERISK

Motherisk questions are prepared by the Motherisk Team at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Ont. Ms Kennedy is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences at the University of Toronto. Dr Koren is Director of the Motherisk Program. Dr Koren is supported by the Research Leadership for Better Pharmacotherapy during Pregnancy and Lactation. He holds the Ivey Chair in Molecular Toxicology in the Department of Medicine at the University of Western Ontario in London.

Do you have questions about the effects of drugs, chemicals, radiation, or infections in women who are pregnant or breastfeeding? We invite you to submit them to the Motherisk Program by fax at 416 813-7562; they will be addressed in future Motherisk Updates.

Published Motherisk Updates are available on the Canadian Family Physician website (www.cfp.ca) and also on the Motherisk website (www.motherisk.org).

Footnotes

This article is eligible for Mainpro-M1 credits.

To earn credits, go to www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro link.

Competing interests

Dr Koren serves as a paid consultant for Bayer Inc and Duchesnay Inc, producers of prenatal vitamins and folic acid.

References

1. Wald N, Sneddon J, Densem J, Frost C, Stone R. Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. Medical Research Council Vitamin Study Research Group. Lancet. 1991;338(8760):131–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Czeizel AE, Dudás I. Prevention of the first occurrence of neural-tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(26):1832–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. De Wals P, Tairou F, Van Allen MI, Uh SH, Lowry RB, Sibbald B, et al. Reduction in neural-tube defects after folic acid fortification in Canada. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(2):135–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Wald NJ, Law MR, Morris JK, Wald DS. Quantifying the effect of folic acid. Lancet. 2001;358(9298):2069–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Bar-Oz B, Koren G, Nguyen P, Kapur BM. Folate fortification and supplementation—are we there yet? Reprod Toxicol. 2008;25(4):408–12. Epub 2008 May 3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Chandler CJ, Harrison DA, Buffington CA, Santiago NA, Halsted CH. Functional specificity of jejunal brush-border pteroylpolyglutamate hydrolase in pig. Am J Physiol. 1991;260(6 Pt 1):G865–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Van der Linden IJ, Afman LA, Heil SG, Blom HJ. Genetic variation in genes of folate metabolism and neural-tube defect risk. Proc Nutr Soc. 2006;65(2):204–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Wang X, Shen F, Freisheim JH, Gentry LE, Ratnam M. Differential stereospecificities and affinities of folate receptor isoforms for folate compounds and antifolates. Biochem Pharmacol. 1992;44(9):1898–901. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Kamen BA, Smith AK. A review of folate receptor alpha cycling and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate accumulation with an emphasis on cell models in vitro. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56(8):1085–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Shane B. Folate chemistry and metabolism. In: Bailey LB, editor. Folate in health and disease. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2009. pp. 4–5. [Google Scholar]

11. Rothenberg SP, da Costa MP, Sequeira JM, Cracco J, Roberts JL, Weedon J, et al. Autoantibodies against folate receptors in women with a pregnancy complicated by a neural-tube defect. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(2):134–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Pei L, Liu J, Zhang Y, Zhu H, Ren A. Association of reduced folate carrier gene polymorphism and maternal folic acid use with neural tube defects. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2009;150B(6):874–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Christensen KE, Rozen R. Genetic variation: effect on folate metabolism and health. In: Bailey LB, editor. Folate in health and disease. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2009. pp. 93–4. [Google Scholar]

14. De Marco P, Calevo MG, Moroni A, Merello E, Raso A, Finnell RH, et al. Reduced folate carrier polymorphism (80A→G) and neural tube defects. Eur J Hum Genet. 2003;11(3):245–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Shaw GM, Lammer EJ, Zhu H, Baker MW, Neri E, Finnell RH. Maternal periconceptional vitamin use, genetic variation of infant reduced folate carrier (A80G), and risk of spina bifida. Am J Med Genet. 2002;108(1):1–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Brody LC, Conley M, Cox C, Kirke PN, McKeever MP, Mills JL, et al. A polymorphism, R653Q, in the trifunctional enzyme methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase/methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase/formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase is a maternal genetic risk factor for neural tube defects: report of the Birth Defects Research Group. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71(5):1207–15. Epub 2002 Oct 16. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. De Marco P, Merello E, Calevo MG, Mascelli S, Raso A, Cama A, et al. Evaluation of a methylenetetrahydrofolate-dehydrogenase 1958G>A polymorphism for neural tube defect risk. J Hum Genet. 2006;51(2):98–103. Epub 2005 Nov 29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Johnson WG, Stenroos ES, Spychala JR, Chatkupt S, Ming SX, Buyske S. New 19 bp deletion polymorphism in intron-1 of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR): a risk factor for spina bifida acting in mothers during pregnancy? Am J Med Genet A. 2004;124A(4):339–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Botto LD, Yang Q. 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene variants and congenital anomalies: a HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151(9):862–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. De Marco P, Calevo MG, Moroni A, Arata L, Merello E, Finnell RH, et al. Study of MTHFR and MS polymorphisms as risk factors for NTD in the Italian population. J Hum Genet. 2002;47(6):319–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Volcik KA, Shaw GM, Zhu H, Lammer EJ, Laurent C, Finnell RH. Associations between polymorphisms within the thymidylate synthase gene and spina bifida. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2003;67(11):924–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Matok I, Gorodischer R, Koren G, Landau D, Wiznitzer A, Levy A. Exposure to folic acid antagonists during the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of major malformations. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;68(6):956–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Stothard KJ, Tennant PW, Bell R, Rankin J. Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;301(6):636–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Nguyen P, Tam C, O’Connor DL, Kapur B, Koren G. Steady state folate concentrations achieved with 5 compared with 1.1 mg folic acid supplementation among women of child-bearing age. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(3):844–52. Epub 2009 Jan 21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Kennedy DA, Stern SJ, Moretti M, Matok I, Sarkar M, Nickel C, et al. Folate intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;35(1):2–10. Epub 2010 Dec 21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada